Regular Updates Weekly

My name is Hallan Turrek. This is my blog.

Monday, August 31, 2009

Blog Banter #11: Friendship... AGAIN?

Welcome to the eleventh installment of the EVE Blog Banter, the monthly EVE Online blogging extravaganza created by CrazyKinux. The EVE Blog Banter involves an enthusiastic group of gaming bloggers, a common topic within the realm of EVE Online, and a week to post articles pertaining to the said topic. The resulting articles can either be short or quite extensive, either funny or dead serious, but are always a great fun to read! Any questions about the EVE Blog Banter should be directed here. Check out other EVE Blog Banter articles at the bottom of this post!

This month's banter comes to us from Joe Brusati a long time reader of CrazyKinux's Musing, who asks the following: CCP states that T3 Strategic Cruisers are just the start for the T3 line-up. In future Eve expansions what would you like to see as the next T3 ship type. Please be specific on details about what role this ship would play, cost of manufacturing, and the different modules that would be available for it, and of course you must give your T3 ship a name!

I don't like the concept of T3 ships as they are now. That makes it kind of hard to talk about how future T3 ships should be handled. Why are my answers to these excellent questions often so short?

Screw it.

6 comments:

  1. Tech 3 frigates.

    Secretly I would rename my ship The Incursinator but it's production name would be the Nazgul.Or something like that....

    Its role . . . hmm, I don't know. It has to be better than an Ishkur somehow. Maybe it could be black and shiny silver and have demonic red 'eyes' above two fangs. Over the single fanged Inc.

    I think I am thinking about this too much.

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. not sure what is wrong with T3..the only thing I see is cost and comlexity....is it one of these two things that bugs ya?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cop out.

    At the very least, verbalize what you don't like and how you would fix them.

    Otherwise, why bother posting about the blog banter at all?

    ReplyDelete
  4. He's expressing his frustration at the utter broken-ness of T3. I don't agree with it but its his view.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Id like to see t3 BS or BS, maybe it will fix the broken Black ops, itd be hard but t3 cruisers fail to compete against their t2 counter parts in a focused roll and are to unpredictable in a vaired roll,

    Id like a gallente one to be called the Prometheus, to go along with Proteus, although trying to balance cool and actual balance is hard

    ReplyDelete
  6. Cost is my main issue, to those that are curious. I barely fly tech 2(and if I do, it's a frigate), I'll likely never fly tech 3, and if I do, never in PvP.

    ReplyDelete