Regular Updates Weekly

My name is Hallan Turrek. This is my blog.

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Genos Occidere joins Sev3rance

There's something happening here
What it is ain't exactly clear
There's a man with a gun over there
Telling me I got to beware
Buffalo Springfield - For What It's Worth

So there's an odd thing going on in Providence. It looks like Genos Occidere has joined Sev3rance Alliance.

What I do know is that Genos has a lot of very skilled pilots, and that AAA and allies will have some trouble on their hands. How much is still to be seen, a small cadre of great pilots won't do much against the onslaught providence faces these days.

It's odd though, because up till now Genos has been quite content to blow up everything they can in Provi, killing a fleet of CVA ships as recently as the 10 days ago.

Now it seems they're killing everyone but CVA and friends. The whole world's gone topsy turvy.

Are they protecting a fertile hunting ground? Is this part of a long term plan to play a NRDS game from now on? Did they get really high one night and think this was totally like... a good idea?

The corp description says they're a Caldari aligned-NRDS-role playing-anti pirate corp.

Like... really? I've met Count MonteCarlo a few times in battle, and despite being a great pilot, he never really struck me as "anti-pirate". And that's being nice about it.

Man, what's even more fucked up is that I just noticed Larkonis Trassler is a member.

This is weird shit.


  1. We shot his 'fleet' up yesterday in Esoteria. His macharial is fast I'll give him that but that's about all he has going for him.

  2. From chatting to him it sounds like they're actually really enjoying it. -7- seemed very keen to have them, from a pragmatic point of view. NRDS isn't that much of a problem when you have a red list as long as CVA and they don't get involved in home defence gangs. Its noticeable that the quality of -7- gangs has already started to improve without their leadership. At the moment they're doing more damage in Catch than we are in Providence.

  3. This comment has been removed by the author.